The Full SLAAIT
Issue 1, May 22, 2024
Welcome
These newsletters will be going out regularly, and will include project updates, pertinent resources with brief synopses, commentary, etc.
Have something you want featured? Send Leila a message via email (lalubean@gmail.com) or on Slack.
The updated, user-friendly bibliographic resource list can be found here.
Has anybody else been seeing AI pop up on software left and right lately like I have? Adobe PDF reader and Zoom have both displayed new AI options for me in the past month, and I played Pictionary vs. AI with my kids this past weekend. I’m impressed with these AI assistants’ ability to provide summarization of scholarly articles and rapid captioning of conversations. The jury is still out on if my rudimentary illustrations or the board game app need more refinement, though I suspect it to be a bit of both.
Project Updates
Last week during a well-attended meeting, Margo Gustina guided CIRCL participants in small work groups to discuss CIRCL’s and rural libraries' role within the SLAAIT project, and she’ll provide the breakdown of the responses by June 14th.
Also in June, an in-person SLAAIT meet up will take place at San Diego State University, from 9:00am to 11:00am, on Saturday, June 29th. We hope you can join us!
We had one seminar discussion in April led by Riley about identifying AI-generated content. He and Kim are getting more seminars scheduled for this summer, with great speakers anticipated, including some of our very own SLAAIT team members.
Kim and Sylvia have been busy interviewing SLAAIT participants, with the feedback from those interviews to be analyzed and disseminated soon. If you haven't spoken with them yet, send them a message via email (kim@brightsail.com) or on Slack.
David's Corner
Riding the Hype Cycle
[AIUsage: I used Microsoft’s Copilot AI to edit this document and ChatGPT to make the pretty picture]
In the months that have followed ChatGPT’s launch “Generative AI,” and “Large Language Models” have entered our vocabulary. The rhetoric around AI’s potential in the library world and beyond has risen. We now have AI driven devices like Meta’s Ray-Ban Smart Glasses, or the Rabbit R1, or Humane’s AI Pin that promise to be screenless personal assistants, whispering the world’s knowledge into our ears.
We are also now seeing the hype of Generative AI’s potential hit some pretty real roadblocks. Scientists are finding that gains in AI work are plateauing[1]. Those AI devices are being rather harshly reviewed[2]. Cities have found chatbots giving out not only wrong advice, but potentially illegal advice[3]. Is AI done? Has the bubble burst…it, of course, depends.
This is not the first time a technological transformation has risen and fallen in expectations. iPhones didn’t cure cancer. The web didn’t make everyone rich. Social media didn’t bring us all closer together. They all rode the Hype Cycle.
Gartner, a consulting firm, developed the Hype Cycle to watch the diffusion and adoption of technologies[4]. They found that adoption of technology didn’t follow a nice bell curve like the one Everett Rogers predicted in his diffusion of innovation work (innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards). Instead, innovations grew in expectation, didn’t meet the inflated expectations, and then slammed out of favor, and eventually found a place where capability and expectation matched. They called it the Hype Cycle.
A "Technology Trigger” would gain some attention. That attention would grow to a “Peak of Inflated Expectation” then fall into a “Trough of Disillusionment,” followed by a growing “Slope of Enlightenment” and finally find a “Plateau of Productivity.”
When SLAAIT began, Generative AI was at the very tippy top of the "Peak of Inflated Expectations.”
Maximum hype. It is bound to fall when people with a straight face talk about how Generative AI will cure disease, solve the climate crisis, and even fix democracy. It won’t, at least not in its current state. It has already been proven that it will change how written work is done, evaluated, and treated in scholarly and literary circles. So, what will stick? Will there, in 5 years, be a Copilot[AI]+PC as just announced by Microsoft[5]…probably not. Any good technology that lasts begins to submerge behind the problems one is trying to solve, not take center stage looking for problems to fix.
So, is that it? Is SLAAIT done? We saw the rise, now we will document the fall, and look for the useful? We need to take a critical eye to the promises and look for the useful. However, we also need to step back and look at our terms.
On Gartner’s Hyper Cycle while Generative AI sits at maximum hype, it is surrounded on both sides by a host of different types of AI. Coming up the hill? Causal AI, Composite AI, AI Simulations. On the way down? EdgeAI and AI Maker and Teaching Kits. And all over the graph AI and machine learning related topics like Computer Vision, Autonomous Vehicles, Prompt Engineering, Decision Intelligence. Here we see inviable AI – systems at the core of the technology we do notice-is changing our world without the hype.
AI approaches have already transformed things like text detection that runs scanning projects. Where machine translation used to depend on complex mapping of languages, AI has done a faster and better job in translation…and in real time. Scanning texts, translating them, and speaking them aloud all have a real impact today on the work of libraries. And for our communities? AI has already disrupted how people are reviewed for jobs and hiring decisions[6]…and in granting parole[7], and in setting insurance rates[8]. In fact, while Generative AI has grabbed the spotlight, more and more “mundane” functions are being transformed by deep learning and neural networks.
We all need to keep this in mind as our work proceeds.
[1] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/we-reaching-llm-plateau-david-elliman-frsa-fbcs-po8se/
[ 2] https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/mkbhds-humane-ai-pin-review-reveals-its-fatal-flaw-its-not-bad-tech-its-just-a-bad-idea.html#:~:text=A%20lot%20of%20reviewers%20have,Then%20there's%20Marques%20Brownlee's%20review.
[3] https://apnews.com/article/new-york-city-chatbot-misinformation-6ebc71db5b770b9969c906a7ee4fae21
[4] https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hype-cycle
[5] https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2024/05/20/introducing-copilot-pcs/
[6] https://financialpost.com/fp-work/ai-job-interviews
[7] https://theconversation.com/a-black-box-ai-system-has-been-influencing-criminal-justice-decisions-for-over-two-decades-its-time-to-open-it-up-200594
[8] https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/insurance-2030-the-impact-of-ai-on-the-future-of-insuranceAI-related Article Synopses
Today I’ll feature a piece written by authors at two different universities in Nigeria, entitled Contemporary Library and Artificial Intelligence Technology [1]. As a novice with AI, I appreciated the brief overview of AI, including the general observation that “AI excels in perception and pattern recognition on a large scale and at a faster speed than humans.” In this article, the authors posit that librarians will use AI to improve their service delivery to patrons, with applications to include robotic book delivery using RFID tags, PLEXUS references to inform patrons of citation processes, catalog automation, and provision of translation services to international students. Notably, a challenge presented was the “lack of technical expertise among librarians in using and operating AI systems.”
Elon University’s Imagining the Digital Future Center [2] released a report with poll data just last week with information about Americans’ attitudes regarding AI and politics. Unsurprisingly, 78% of adults surveyed “believe it is likely that AI will be abused to affect the presidential election outcome,” and that only 69% are “not confident that most voters can detect fake photos.” In addition, 61% of respondents said they have heard “a little” about AI, and 53% of those who had heard at least a little about AI had not ever used an AI language model. This information should be useful for librarians across settings to educate their patrons on AI, elections, and digital citizenship.
[1] Adesina, A. & Zubairu, A. (2024). Contemporary library and artificial intelligence technology. Alexandria: The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues, 0(0), p. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/09557490241231483
[2] Imagining the Digital Future Center. (2024, May 15). Reports and publications. AI & Politics ’24. https://imaginingthedigitalfuture.org/reports-and-publications/ai-politics-24/
AI-related Funnies
And to finish, enjoy these AI-related cartoons…