WHO AM I?
This is a brief summary of who I am
Who am I?
My Dog!!
Video games
Music
Origin
Hockey
MY FAVOURITE THINGS
My life line
The day I was born
The day I moved
Going to India for the 1st time.
First day of school
The day I played my first hockey match
The first day of middle school
I went to mountain ash middle school so I got to meet people from R J lee and Eagle plains. Those people that I met turned out to become my best friends.
Grade 8 graduation
Entering Highschool
Going to LA
My future
My Personality Tests
My top section is section 6 which is my kinesthetic learning which was also my top learning way in my blueprint. 2nd is section 5 which is interpersonal strength which I think is a good number two because I’m really good with people and listening which is why business is the path I want to go in . 3rd is logical strength I don’t think this is my 3rd but If I work on it hands on my logical strength increases. 4th is my intrapersonal strength which is the complete opposite of me which is because I like working with other people instead of being alone. I tend to work better in a group 5th is a 3 way tie with naturalist, musical, and verbal strength. I agree with 2/3 because I’m not the biggest ecologist and I’ve never liked playing music but I like hearing it. The one I disagree on is my verbal strength because I’m a very strong speaker in presentations or just in general social places. 6th is Existential strength I agree with this because I feel this strength is for more open minded people and I’m a narrow minded person and I am not a philosopher person. Although my parents love religion I am not religious at all. I also don’t believe in horoscopes. And my weakest strength is my visual which I completely agree with because I am horrible at visualizing things and learning, I have to learn and study or I wont learn at all.
My strongest strength was just what I expected because I’m a very good at learning hands just like a kinesthetic person would. Thing I was surprised with was intrapersonal strength, and my verbal strength. This is because for intrapersonal strength I like working in groups because the work is more spread around and it’s much more fun. I do not like working by myself. My second surprise was my verbal skill which I like to think is my 2nd or 3rd best asset I have because I’m good at talking and good with stuff like presentations.
I will use my strength to do more things hand on instead of listening or visualizing it in my head. For math I could practice book questions more, for auto instead of looking at the manual I will go do the assignments by asking questions and doing them myself. I know that I like a group environment much more than if I worked alone. I know that my logical strength is also high which is good for subjects like math and science which require a lot of logical reasoning
True Colors- My colour assessment said that I was a adventurous orange with responsible gold coming close, then curious green 3rd, and lastly Harmonious blue . That fact that adventurous orange did not surprise me it was that responsible gold came 2nd. To me that is interesting because I think that those two are opposites. Responsible gold to me is someone who doesn't take chances and is a very structured and organized person. I feel I’m more adventurous and less narrow minded. I’m more open and free and I like to take risks. I think that I got more responsible gold because I am respectful and although I’m not too organized. I think that I’m more curious green and, adventurous orange because I’m curious about stuff humans can’t explain like how we exist and not too interested in math and science.
The test I received for the other tests was that I’m harmonious blue which was really weird because I didn't have any X’s for harmonious blue but if you read the description from the other site I can kind of understand how I can be classified as harmonious blue. The other site said I was “ Idealistic”. “Loyal”, “good at communicating” and I feel that applies with me. I don't feel that I am a sensitive person and that I value the feelings of other people a lot. So to describe myself the best I would say I’m a Loyal curious risk taking impulsive person. Those traits would be great for jobs like business owner or a psychologist.
Leadership Style Test-
Leadership style
Description
Situation
Personal Example
Leader as a Teller
Tells the team what to do and how to do it.
Makes all the decisions.
Does not seek input from the team or participate in task completion.
Assumes the team members are experienced and capable.
A scenario in which a leader as a teller is good is when you're a teacher because you should be the one in charge and sometimes if you give students a lot of responsibilities they can abuse the power.
Another scenario which is a good of for this type of leadership is the CEO of a company because he can lose respect or he might not get things done if he doesn't tell people what to do.
I'm the captain of my hockey team and I usually tell my teammates what to do because I’m the most experienced in my team.
Leader as a Delegator
The end-goal is broken down into smaller tasks
Then, each team member is assigned a separate task.
Delegator expects results from each individual member
Participates by compiling the results for the group as a whole
One good situation for this is being a president or prime minister of a country because you can’t know everything and usually presidents have expertises in each category of their country like the army, education, hospitals. The prime minister could ask these expertises what's the most important things that need to be done and give the resources to those people to do what they need to do.
In my middle school I in a debate and my teacher made me the leader so I made each person do what they're known for. People that are good at speaking would come to the front with me to present our arguments. People that like to work silently research for us on our arguments.
Leader as a Persuader
Encourages cooperation from all members
Uses each member's strengths to make them more involved in task
Includes team members in decision but is ultimately responsible for making the final decision
This would be great in businesses because you would hire people that are good in certain aspects like computers, drawing, presenting and tell them to to a specific task like promoting a product. The artist would draw a logo, then the computer guy will make the logo in a program like adobe illustrator and then the presenter would present his or her company logo.
When I was selling chocolate with a group of friends I would set certain areas of my area to certain people but I was the one making the decisions of where each person goes
Leader as a Consultant
Encourages team to participate in the decision making
Final decisions are made based on the group consensus
Relies on each member's areas of expertise or opinion.
Actively participates with the team throughout task completion
This would be great as a guidance counselor or consultant. For example for a group of individuals struggling with an alcoholic problem the consultant would make the group work together to get rid of their problems.
I am not a leader as a consultant.
Leader as a Joiner
Sees him/herself as a member of the team
Uncomfortable with the title of “leader”- wants to be equal with other team members
Decisions are made by everyone on the team
Acts as a “spokesperson” for the team
This would be good for situations such as community service where you could be in charge of a group of people but would spread the work equally
When I was in a french group I was made leader of my group. I’m not good at french so I made myself a “member” of the group so I wouldn't make my group do bad because I didn't know what to do. When the teacher told us to present I did most of the presenting but the work was done equally which made me the “spokesperson”